INTERLAKE SPORTING ASSOCIATION
This is the official web site for the closest 200yd rifle,
pistol, archery and paintball range,
mixed-use sporting facility and nature preserve to Seattle and
Bellevue
ROSE HILL ANNEXATION - RCW
The RCW may be found here;
http://search.mrsc.org/nxt/gateway.dll?f=templates&fn=legpage.htm$vid=rcwwac:leg
and here;
http://www.leg.wa.gov/rcw/index.cfm
RCW sections relevant to annexation and the Boundary Review Board actions are listed here, directly copied from the source. Please address these points in any communication with the BRB. All are from section 36.93.
RCW 36.93.150
Review of proposed actions -- Actions and determinations of board -- Disapproval, effect.
The board, upon review of any proposed action, shall take such of the following actions as it deems
necessary to best carry out the intent of this chapter:
(1) Approve the proposal as submitted.
(2) Subject to RCW 35.02.170, modify the proposal by adjusting boundaries to add or delete
territory. However, any proposal for annexation of territory to a town shall be subject to RCW 35.21.010
and the board shall not add additional territory, the amount of which is greater than that included in
the original proposal. Any modifications shall not interfere with the authority of a city, town, or
special purpose district to require or not require preannexation agreements, covenants, or petitions. A
board shall not modify the proposed incorporation of a city with an estimated population of seven
thousand five hundred or more by removing territory from the proposal, or adding territory to the
proposal, that constitutes ten percent or more of the total area included within the proposal before the
board. However, a board shall remove territory in the proposed incorporation that is located outside of
an urban growth area or is annexed by a city or town, and may remove territory in the proposed incorporation if a petition or resolution proposing the annexation is filed or adopted that has priority
over the proposed incorporation, before the area is established that is subject to this ten percent
restriction on removing or adding territory. A board shall not modify the proposed incorporation of a city with a population of seven thousand five hundred or more to reduce the territory in such a manner
as to reduce the population below seven thousand five hundred.
(3) Determine a division of assets and liabilities between two or more governmental units where
relevant.
(4) Determine whether, or the extent to which, functions of a special purpose district are to be
assumed by an incorporated city or town, metropolitan municipal corporation, or another existing special
purpose district.
(5) Disapprove the proposal except that the board shall not have jurisdiction: (a) To disapprove
the dissolution or disincorporation of a special purpose district which is not providing services but
shall have jurisdiction over the determination of a division of the assets and liabilities of a dissolved or disincorporated special purpose district; (b) over the division of assets and liabilities
of a special purpose district that is dissolved or disincorporated pursuant to chapter 36.96 RCW; nor
(c) to disapprove the incorporation of a city with an estimated population of seven thousand five
hundred or more, but the board may recommend against the proposed incorporation of a city with such an
estimated population.
Unless the board disapproves a proposal, it shall be presented under the appropriate statute for
approval of a public body and, if required, a vote of the people. A proposal that has been modified
shall be presented under the appropriate statute for approval of a public body and if required, a vote of the people. If a proposal, other than that for a city, town, or special purpose district annexation,
after modification does not contain enough signatures of persons within the modified area, as are
required by law, then the initiating party, parties or governmental unit has thirty days after the modification decision to secure enough signatures to satisfy the legal requirement. If the signatures
cannot be secured then the proposal may be submitted to a vote of the people, as required by law.
The addition or deletion of property by the board shall not invalidate a petition which had
previously satisfied the sufficiency of signature provisions of RCW 35.13.130 or 35A.14.120. When the
board, after due proceedings held, disapproves a proposed action, such proposed action shall be unavailable, the proposing agency shall be without power to initiate the same or substantially the same
as determined by the board, and any succeeding acts intended to or tending to effectuate that action
shall be void, but such action may be reinitiated after a period of twelve months from date of
disapproval and shall again be subject to the same consideration.
The board shall not modify or deny a proposed action unless there is evidence on the record to
support a conclusion that the action is inconsistent with one or more of the objectives under RCW
36.93.180. Every such determination to modify or deny a proposed action shall be made in writing pursuant to a motion, and shall be supported by appropriate written findings and conclusions, based on
the record.
RCW 36.93.170
Factors to be considered by board -- Incorporation proceedings exempt from state environmental policy
act.
In reaching a decision on a proposal or an alternative, the board shall consider the factors affecting
such proposal, which shall include, but not be limited to the following:
(1) Population and territory; population density; land area and land uses; comprehensive plans and
zoning, as adopted under chapter 35.63, 35A.63, or 36.70 RCW; comprehensive plans and development
regulations adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW; applicable service agreements entered into under chapter
36.115 or 39.34 RCW; applicable interlocal annexation agreements between a county and its cities; per
capita assessed valuation; topography, natural boundaries and drainage basins, proximity to other
populated areas; the existence and preservation of prime agricultural soils and productive agricultural
uses; the likelihood of significant growth in the area and in adjacent incorporated and unincorporated areas during the next ten years; location and most desirable future location of community facilities;
(2) Municipal services; need for municipal services; effect of ordinances, governmental codes,
regulations and resolutions on existing uses; present cost and adequacy of governmental services and
controls in area; prospects of governmental services from other sources; probable future needs for such
services and controls; probable effect of proposal or alternative on cost and adequacy of services and
controls in area and adjacent area; the effect on the finances, debt structure, and contractual
obligations and rights of all affected governmental units; and
(3) The effect of the proposal or alternative on adjacent areas, on mutual economic and social
interests, and on the local governmental structure of the county.
RCW 36.93.180
Objectives of boundary review board.
The decisions of the boundary review board shall attempt to achieve the following objectives:
(1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities;
(2) Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land
contours;
(3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas;
(4) Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries;
(5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporation of
cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas;
(6) Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts;
(7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries;
(8) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which
are urban in character; and
(9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive
agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority.
RCW 36.93.190
Decision of board not to affect existing franchises, permits, codes, ordinances, etc., for ten years.
For a period of ten years from the date of the final decision, no proceeding, approval, action, or
decision on a proposal or an alternative shall be deemed to cancel any franchise or permit theretofore
granted by the authorities governing the territory to be annexed, nor shall it be deemed to supersede
the application as to any territory to be annexed, of such construction codes and ordinances (including
but not limited to fire, electrical, and plumbing codes and ordinances) as shall have been adopted by
the authorities governing the territory to be annexed and in force at the time of the decision.
Have a suggestion, a question or want to see something else
here? Please email!
Back to Interlake Home
This page compliments of and copyright Jaegerdesigns©2002
all rights reserved.